Episode 133 - "He saw and believed" - John 20:1-10

John 20:1   Now on the first day of the week Mary Magdalene came to the tomb early, while it was still dark, and saw that the stone had been taken away from the tomb. 2 So she ran and went to Simon Peter and the other disciple, the one whom Jesus loved, and said to them, “They have taken the Lord out of the tomb, and we do not know where they have laid him.” 3 So Peter went out with the other disciple, and they were going toward the tomb. 4 Both of them were running together, but the other disciple outran Peter and reached the tomb first. 5 And stooping to look in, he saw the linen cloths lying there, but he did not go in. 6 Then Simon Peter came, following him, and went into the tomb. He saw the linen cloths lying there, 7 and the face cloth, which had been on Jesus’ head, not lying with the linen cloths but folded up in a place by itself. 8 Then the other disciple, who had reached the tomb first, also went in, and he saw and believed; 9 for as yet they did not understand the Scripture, that he must rise from the dead. 10 Then the disciples went back to their homes.

I cannot adequately describe how much this story of Jesus’ resurrection excites me. The details John gives us often are subtle ways to either reveal a spiritual truth or help us better understand some of the personalities in the stories. Think of John’s details about John the Baptist or the Samaritan woman at the well. The little details help us see their passion and excitement for what is revealed to them. It is for this reason I’ve chosen to create a few separate posts for the same text. There is a lot in this story.

Last week I focused on the theme of “darkness” in John’s gospel and how it represents the ignorance of people concerning Jesus. That is an oversimplification. However, in this story, Mary (and likely others) came to the tomb “while it was still dark.” (John 20:1) They were ignorant of what had just happened with Jesus. His body was gone from the tomb and they assume his body has been moved somewhere. This is not to suggest that it was not actually dark at the tomb when they arrived. However, just like the condition made it more difficult to best observe the scene in and around the tomb, they were in need of the “true Light coming into the world” to fully recognize the significance of what had just happened.

Mary ran to tell the disciples that Jesus body has been taken away and,  from verses three through ten, the focus shifts to Peter and “the other disciple . . who Jesus loved.” (We understand this to be the Apostle John) Peter and John ran to the tomb. John ran faster and reached the tomb first, but stopped at the entrance. Scholars have attempted guesses at why John stopped. All we really know is that he did and he tells us that he saw the linen cloths lying there. Remember, John has already told us this was a new tomb and had never been used as such. These could not have been from another body. Can you imagine the anxiety he must have felt? It’s obvious that Peter doesn’t give it a second thought to run right past John and into the tomb. He also sees the linen cloths lying there. 

Let’s stop right here for a moment and consider a few things. First of all, what did that look like? If these cloths were wrapped around Jesus’ body and had the various ointments and such applied to them, is it possible these cloths maintained some measure of the form of a body still in them? In other words, could it have been that, at first glance, they thought Jesus was still there? That may be a stretch. But, it seems possible. If that was the case, then it heightens the importance of the headcloth. This translation reads the head cloth was “folded up.” (v. 7) However, the Greek word used could also mean “wrapped up or around.” The potential sight for these first visitors to the tomb was what appeared to be a wrapped corpse. But, there was only one problem. The head cloth was “in a place by itself.” There was nothing connecting the headcloth to the cloths around the body. The body had come through the cloths. Again, my interpretation could be a stretch. But, this detail that John is including reveals the evidence of a miracle that led him to believe if that is indeed what they saw.

Perhaps more likely what this detail describes is that of an orderly scene. Grave cloths lying there and the head cloth folded up in a place by itself is hardly the description of a scene of a grave robbery. If someone were to steal the body, would they bother to unwrap it before they took it? No. If it could be argued they did unwrap the body, is it likely the grave clothes were lying there in the orderly manner described? Absolutely not. 

However these details are to be interpreted, the evidence is clear that his body was not stolen by Roman soldiers, Jewish leaders, Jesus’ disciples or anyone else. If his body was not stolen, what happened to it?

John indicates his own conclusion upon seeing the whole scene after he entered the tomb. “He saw and believed.” (v. 8) Believed what? Verse 9 explains, “for as yet they did not understand the Scripture, that he must rise from the dead.” His point is that the evidence before him led him to believe that Jesus had risen from the dead. Jesus had prepared them for this. They just hadn’t understood the Scriptures prophesying the death and resurrection of the Messiah. 

You and I cannot go back in time to stand alongside these disciples and observe the scene ourselves. But, they have provided us with a vivid account. The details they have given as firsthand eyewitnesses are amazing. The question to us is, “Will we see the significance and believe?”

Episode 65 - His "vision" is improving - John 9:13-17

John 9:13   They brought to the Pharisees the man who had formerly been blind. 14 Now it was a Sabbath day when Jesus made the mud and opened his eyes. 15 So the Pharisees again asked him how he had received his sight. And he said to them, “He put mud on my eyes, and I washed, and I see.” 16 Some of the Pharisees said, “This man is not from God, for he does not keep the Sabbath.” But others said, “How can a man who is a sinner do such signs?” And there was a division among them. 17 So they said again to the blind man, “What do you say about him, since he has opened your eyes?” He said, “He is a prophet.”

What has become apparent is that Jesus has, as we say, created a stir. People who recognized him are amazed that this man who has been blind and begged all his life is now walking around on his own able to see. 

When asked what happened that caused him to see, he has responded very factually with no additional commentary on the miracle or the miracle worker Jesus. So, people take him to the Pharisees. Uh oh. This can’t be good, right? Then, John mentions that it was the Sabbath (again) that Jesus healed this man. You can sense the conflict coming again can’t you. They’ve sought to kill him for healing the lame man on the Sabbath. Will this healing change their minds about Jesus? Let’s “see” what happens as they investigate this amazing event. They ask the man how he received his sight. The man gave them the same factual information that he’d given the crowd at the temple.

Initially, this creates a division among the Pharisees. Some dig their heals into the sand and insist that Jesus is “not from God, for he does not keep the Sabbath.” But, others ask “How can a man who is a sinner do such signs?” That’s a good question. What is your answer to that question? Have you thought about that?

With this conflict among the Pharisees, some of them finally have the sense to ask the man who had been healed his opinion about Jesus’ identity. I love the irony here. The religious expert are divided and cannot come to a conclusion, so they ask the man who had been healed. 

Remember how this story started? Jesus and his disciples see the blind man begging and his disciples make an assumption about the man and his condition. They assume that this blind is God’s judgment upon him for sin of his parents or even himself as an unborn child. These disciples are expressing what obviously would have been a cultural and common expectation. Certainly the Pharisees had no higher view of him. “He’s a sinner!” But, here they are asking his opinion on something they cannot agree. 

There is no evidence that the man had been asked this question before. Furthermore, we don’t know how much time this man might have had to consider his answer. But, it appears that his answer is quick and confident: “He is a prophet.” 

What we have here is that after the man’s physical eyes begin to see, now his spiritual vision is gaining clarity. No longer is Jesus just a man who put mud on his eyes and told him where to go wash. Things are coming together for him and he realizes that there is something spiritually special about Jesus and he recognizes that Jesus is a prophet. That is correct. The people who ate the loaves and fish in the wilderness area recognized Jesus and the Prophet like Moses who was to come, but soon abandoned him. How will this man respond? We’ll find out in future episodes.