Episode 73 - "I am the Son of God" John 10:31-37
John 10:31 The Jews picked up stones again to stone him. 32 Jesus answered them, “I have shown you many good works from the Father; for which of them are you going to stone me?” 33 The Jews answered him, “It is not for a good work that we are going to stone you but for blasphemy, because you, being a man, make yourself God.” 34 Jesus answered them, “Is it not written in your Law, ‘I said, you are gods’? 35 If he called them gods to whom the word of God came—and Scripture cannot be broken— 36 do you say of him whom the Father consecrated and sent into the world, ‘You are blaspheming,’ because I said, ‘I am the Son of God’? 37 If I am not doing the works of my Father, then do not believe me; 38 but if I do them, even though you do not believe me, believe the works, that you may know and understand that the Father is in me and I am in the Father.” 39 Again they sought to arrest him, but he escaped from their hands.
Why are the Jews wanting to stone Jesus? Because he had just said, “I and the Father are one.”(John 10:30) As had occurred when Jesus had said earlier, “Before Abraham was, I am,” (John 8:58-59) the Jews understand Jesus to be claiming equality with God. That is blasphemous if not true and would deserve the death penalty by stoning according to the Law.
In immediate response to their picking up stones, Jesus calls to their attention the “many good works from the Father” and asks them for which of them are they stoning him. They make it clear that it’s not for a good work they are going to stone him, but for blasphemy. In an indirect way, it appears that Jesus has elicited an acknowledgment that he has done good works from the Father but they are ignoring that fact and accuse him of blasphemy.
Before returning to the evidence of the works he has done, Jesus quotes part of Psalm 82:6, “I said, you are gods.” What is this all about? Why is Jesus using this verse and what is the point? Here is the immediate context:
“Psa. 82:5 They have neither knowledge nor understanding,
they walk about in darkness;
all the foundations of the earth are shaken.
Psa. 82:6 I said, “You are gods,
sons of the Most High, all of you;
7 nevertheless, like men you shall die,
and fall like any prince.” (ESV)
Essentially, the writer of this psalm is speaking for God and indicting leaders of Israel for their injustice to the people under them. He says they “walk about in darkness.” (82:5) That is followed by a reminder of who God intended them to be. They were to be leaders with the authority to judge and guide the people. Therefore, they are acting as “gods” so to speak. But, their end is certain and they would die like men.
What Jesus is doing is arguing that if the psalmist, who under the leading of the Holy Spirit, can write this about human leaders, how do Jesus’ accusers defend their decision to stone him “who the Father consecrated and sent into the world . . . because I said, ‘I am the Son of God?”(v. 36)
Remember the setting for this event is the Feast of Dedication or Hanukkah. This was when the temple was rededicated or consecrated after the Maccabean Revolt. It’s interesting and not coincidental that Jesus states the Father consecrated him and sent him into the world. Jesus had already said, “Destroy this temple and in three days I will raise it up.” (John 2:19) He was speaking of the temple of his body. Jesus is affirming that he is God’s true dwelling place among people. This fact is reinforced by Jesus explaining, “the Father is in me and I am in the Father.” (v. 38b)
This section concludes with this mob seeking to arrest Jesus but once again, he escapes. It is not his hour.
I hope the obvious “take away” from this section is yet another reminder that Jesus clearly asserts his divine identity. If we struggle with that claim, we should take the challenge offered to his accusers. We should consider the works he did. What would we say about a person who could give sight to a person who has never had sight in their life? What would we say about someone who foretold that he would lay down his own life, then take it back up again and then prove it?